Return to the "Pt. 2: The Person" page

Overhead showing the "Big Five" personality factors

Characteristics of the high scorer

Scales

GLOBAL DOMAINS

Characteristics of the low scorer



Worrying, nervous, emotional, insecure, inadequate, hypochondriacal

Neuroticism (N)

Assesses adjustment versus emotional instability. Identifies individuals prone to psychological distress, unrealistic ideas, excessive cravings or urges, and maladaptive coping responses.



Calm, relaxed, unemotional, hardy, secure, self-satisfied


Sociable, active, talkative, person-oriented, optimistic, fun-loving, affectionate

Extraversion (E)

Assesses quantity and intensity of interpersonal interaction; activity level; need for stimulation; and capacity for joy.



Reserved, sober, unexuberant, aloof, task-oriented, retiring, quiet


Curious, broad interests, creative, original, imaginative, untraditional

Openness (O)

Assesses proactive seeking and appreciation of experience for its own sake; toleration for and exploration of the unfamiliar.



Conventional, down-to-earth, narrow interests, unartistic, unanalytical


Soft-hearted, good-natured, trusting, helpful, forgiving, gullible, straightforward

Agreeableness (A)

Assesses the quality of one’s interpersonal orientation along a continuum from compassion to antagonism in thoughts, feelings, and actions.



Cynical, rude, suspicious, uncooperative, vengeful, ruthless, irritable, manipulative


Organized, reliable, hard-working, self-disciplined, punctual, scrupulous, neat, ambitious, persevering

Conscientiousness (C)

Assesses the individual’s degree of organization, persistence, and motivation in goal-directed behavior. Contrasts dependable, fastidious people with those who are lackadaisical and sloppy.



Aimless, unreliable, lazy, careless, lax, negligent, weak-willed, hedonistic

 

Based on the NEO Personality Inventory- Revised, by P. Costa and R. McCrae, published by Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc., (1992).

Return to the "Pt. 2: The Person" page

The views and opinions expressed in this page are strictly those of the page author. The contents of this page have not been reviewed or approved by the University of Minnesota.